Adiyaman University Repository

Evaluating Ureteral Wall Injuries with Endoscopic Grading System and Analysis of the Predisposing Factors

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Karakan, Tolga
dc.contributor.author Kılınç, Muhammet Fatih
dc.contributor.author Demirbaş, Arif
dc.contributor.author Hascicek, Ahmet Metin
dc.contributor.author Doluoğlu, Ömer Gökhan
dc.contributor.author Yücel, Mehmet Özgür
dc.contributor.author Reşorlu, Berkan
dc.date.accessioned 2023-05-22T06:11:25Z
dc.date.available 2023-05-22T06:11:25Z
dc.date.issued 2016
dc.identifier.issn 0892-7790
dc.identifier.uri http://dspace.adiyaman.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12414/4508
dc.description.abstract Objective: To analyze the predictive factors for intraoperative ureteral wall injury due to semirigid ureteroscopy (URS) used in the treatment of ureteral calculi. Methods: The data of 437 patients who had URS due to ureteral stones were prospectively analyzed. The ureteral wall injuries that occurred during URS were reviewed endoscopically at the end of surgery and divided into two groups as low grade (grades 0 and 1) and high grade (grades 2, 3, and 4) according to classification of ureteral wall injuries. Those two groups were compared for patient and stone characteristics and perioperative findings. Results: Ureteral wall injury was seen in 133 (30.4%) patients after surgery. According to the endoscopic classification of the lesions after URS, grades 0, 1, 2, and 3 injury were seen in 69.5%, 16.4%, 11.2%, and 2.7% of the patients, respectively. There were no grade 4 injuries in our series. Two groups showed statistically significant differences for the location (prox- vs distal and mid-ureter) and size of the stone (9.9mm vs 14.03mm), presence of preoperatively urinary tract infection (UTI) (12% vs 50.8%), needed balloon dilatation (9.8% vs 36.1%), duration of surgery (33.6min vs 43.3min), and surgical success rate (90% vs 76%) (p=0.01, for all). Stone size, location, duration of surgery, and presence of preoperative infection were determined as independent prognostic factors for mucosal injury. Conclusion: The ureteral wall injury grading system may be used for standardized reporting of ureteral lesions after ureteroscopy. Big, proximal ureteral stone, longer operation time, and presence of UTI are the risk factors for ureteral wall injury during URS. tr
dc.language.iso en tr
dc.publisher Mary Ann Lıebert, Inc tr
dc.subject Predıctıve Factors tr
dc.subject laser Lıthotrıps tr
dc.subject Ureteroscopy tr
dc.subject Complıcatıons tr
dc.subject safety tr
dc.subject classıfıcatıon tr
dc.subject surgery tr
dc.subject calculı tr
dc.subject scale tr
dc.title Evaluating Ureteral Wall Injuries with Endoscopic Grading System and Analysis of the Predisposing Factors tr
dc.type Article tr
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-6694-8369 tr
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-1744-0200 tr
dc.contributor.authorID 0000-0002-6920-8606 tr
dc.contributor.department Yenimahalle Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol tr
dc.contributor.department Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Urol, tr
dc.contributor.department Adiyaman Univ, Dept Urol, Fac Med, tr
dc.contributor.department Canakkale 18 Mart Univ, Dept Urol, Fac Med, tr
dc.identifier.endpage 378 tr
dc.identifier.issue 4 tr
dc.identifier.startpage 375 tr
dc.identifier.volume 30 tr
dc.source.title Journal Of Endourology tr


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account