dc.contributor.author |
Kemaloğlu, Cemal Alper |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Kılıç, Fatih |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Doğan, Fatih |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-12-14T06:16:33Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-12-14T06:16:33Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2016 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
2528-8644 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dspace.adiyaman.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12414/4019 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Objective: Prominent ear is one of the most frequent congenital deformities of the ear. The major causes are often due to an underdeveloped antihelical fold, conchal hypertrophy, and a prominent ear lobule. More than 200 different techniques have been described so far. This report presents the effectiveness of a combined technique (Mustarde suture, Furnas suture, and conchal excision), which is frequently used in prominent ear treatment to prevent recurrence.
Material and Methods: Between 2014 and 2015, 18 patients with a mean age of 13.4 years were operated in our clinic. After preoperative measurements were taken to obtain the distance between the helix-mastoid and the angle between the concha-mastoid, patients with an enlarged concha were treated using three surgical techniques (Furnas suture, Mustarde suture, and conchal excision), whereas those who did not have a conchal enlargement were treated using two surgical techniques (Furnas suture and Mustarde suture). At 6 months postoperatively, the distance between the helix-mastoid and the angle between the concha-mastoid were measured as mentioned above, and the new measurements were compared with the preoperative findings.
Results: The desired esthetic results were achieved after the operation. The mean follow-up period was 10 months (range: 6-14 months). Compared with the preoperative findings, there was a statistically significant decrease in the concha-mastoid angle and in the helix-mastoid distance. Complications were not observed except in one patient who had a hematoma and in one patient who had asymmetry.
Conclusion: Asymmetry and recurrence are observed frequently after prominent ear treatment. Combined techniques appear to be effective in preventing recurrence and achieving ideal esthetic results. |
tr |
dc.language.iso |
en |
tr |
dc.publisher |
Wolters kluwer medknow publıcatıonswolters kluwer ındıa PVt LTD, |
tr |
dc.subject |
Prominent ear |
tr |
dc.subject |
Combined techniques |
tr |
dc.subject |
Posterior approach |
tr |
dc.subject |
Recurrence |
tr |
dc.title |
Effectiveness of Combined Technique for the Correction of Prominent Ears |
tr |
dc.type |
Article |
tr |
dc.contributor.authorID |
0000-0001-7382-0702 |
tr |
dc.contributor.authorID |
0000-0001-8761-9321 |
tr |
dc.contributor.department |
Erciyes Univ, Sch Med, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, |
tr |
dc.contributor.department |
Adiyaman Univ, Sch Med, Dept Plast Reconstruct & Aesthet Surg, |
tr |
dc.identifier.endpage |
117 |
tr |
dc.identifier.issue |
3 |
tr |
dc.identifier.startpage |
113 |
tr |
dc.identifier.volume |
24 |
tr |
dc.source.title |
Turkısh Journal Of Plastıc Surgery |
tr |