dc.contributor.author |
Guler, Mete |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bilak, Şemsettin |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Bilgin, Burak |
|
dc.contributor.author |
ve diğerleri |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2022-07-07T05:54:06Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2022-07-07T05:54:06Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
1057-0829 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://dspace.adiyaman.edu.tr:8080/xmlui/handle/20.500.12414/3363 |
|
dc.description.abstract |
Purpose:To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained by Icare PRO rebound tonometer (RT), Tomey FT-1000 noncontact tonometer (NCT), and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in healthy subjects, and to investigate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements.Methods:A total of 132 eyes of 66 healthy subjects were included in the study. All IOP measurements were applied in a sitting position and always in the same order (RT, NCT, and GAT). CCT was measured by noncontact anterior segment optical coherence tomography.Results:The mean CCT was 523.531.2 m. The mean IOPs with GAT, NCT, and RT measurements were 14.56 +/- 2.77, 13.42 +/- 2.99, 14.18 +/- 2.55 mm Hg, respectively. A significantly good agreement was found between RT and GAT measurements (P=0.515). The mean difference between RT and GAT measurements was -0.38 mm Hg. An underestimation was found in NCT measurements compared with GAT ones as defined from paired comparisons (P=0.003). The mean difference between NCT and GAT measurements was -1.14 mm Hg. There was no significant difference between NCT and RT readings (P=0.069). The mean difference between NCT and RT measurements was -0.76 mm Hg. There was a significant correlation between GAT-NCT (r=0.740, P<0.001), GAT-RT (r=0.743, P<0.001), NCT-RT (r=0.729, P<0.001) measurement methods. The increment in measured IOP for a 10 m increase in CCT was 0.16, 0.33, and 0.18 mm Hg for the GAT, NCT, and RT, respectively.Conclusions:The IOP readings with the new Icare PRO RT showed good correlation with those obtained by GAT. Tomey FT-1000 NCT underestimated the IOP compared with GAT. |
tr |
dc.language.iso |
en |
tr |
dc.publisher |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
tr |
dc.subject |
Central corneal thickness |
tr |
dc.subject |
Goldmann applanation tonometer |
tr |
dc.subject |
Intraocular pressure |
tr |
dc.subject |
noncontact tonometer |
tr |
dc.subject |
Rebound tonometer |
tr |
dc.title |
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by icare pro rebound tonometer, tomey ft-1000 noncontact tonometer, and goldmann applanation tonometer in healthy subjects |
tr |
dc.type |
Article |
tr |
dc.contributor.authorID |
0000-0003-2552-4735 |
tr |
dc.contributor.department |
Adiyaman Univ, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, TR-02040 Adiyaman, Turkey |
tr |
dc.contributor.department |
Adiyaman Univ, Dept Ophthalmol, Educ & Res Hosp, Adiyaman, Turkey |
tr |
dc.identifier.endpage |
618 |
tr |
dc.identifier.issue |
8 |
tr |
dc.identifier.startpage |
613 |
tr |
dc.identifier.volume |
24 |
tr |
dc.source.title |
Journal of Glaucoma |
tr |